Thanks for visiting

Friday, November 5, 2010

Where is the ACLU?

As some of you may know a judge in New Jersey refused a woman a restraining order against her husband after he repeatedly raped her.  The judge in the case, Judge Joseph Charles, ruled that since the woman's husband was Muslim he had the right to have sex with her...even if she refused to have sex with him.  The man forced the wife to have sex with him against her will.  Now I'm not a lawyer but I do know what rape is.  Forcing anyone to have sex is rape.  Period.  End of story.  But not in Islam and Judge Charles evidently agrees with that sentiment.  In steps Oklahoma.  As you know we had an election on the second of November and in Oklahoma a measure was passed by the people of Oklahoma stating a judge may not use religious or international law to make a ruling.  The Muslim community is up in arms.  They want the courts to make rulings based on Sharia law as is done in Britain.  So my question is where in the hell is the ACLU?  Don't they champion separation of church and state?  However that may be the reason why they are silent.  Maybe they are fine with Mosque and State.  Muneer Awad, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Oklahoma  filed a lawsuit challenging the measure as violating his First Amendment rights.  That is crap.  First over seventy percent of the voters who voted approved the measure called State Question 755 also known as "Save Our State".  Second, the people in Oklahoma (and in any State) are sovereign and can do as they please as long as the State Constitution isn't violated.  That is why the States have Constitutions after all.  Lastly, the Federal Constitution restrains the Federal government not the sovereign states!  Wake up America!  Contact your newly elected state leaders and demand they pass laws like what Oklahoma has done.  If you don't there may be an Islamic court headed your way sooner than you think.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Last Chance for the Republicans

Unless you are living in a cave you know that today is election day.  It looks like the Republicans have retaken control of the House of Representatives, and so one must wonder what that means.  Is it a repudiation of Obama?  Yes.  Is it the last chance for the Republican party?  Yes.  Mark my words, if the Republicans try and negotiate or compromise with Obama then it will be the end of the Republican Party.  The Tea Parties around the nation are screaming out that they don't want compromise, they don't want half hearted measures; they want the Federal government to be stopped and to be pushed back.  Just stopping the growth of government isn't enough.  The federal government has grown far to large and powerful.  It has its fingers in every facet of our lives and it must be forced back to the bounds the Constitution has set for it, and if that doesn't happen then there will be a Third Party and the Republicans will be a piece of history.  To the freshmen in the House; keep your word.  To the voters; if the freshmen compromise then destroy the Republican Party and build a new party or elevate the Constitution Party to power.  It is your call voters of America.

Monday, October 4, 2010

Firearms Freedom Act Goes to Court

The Firearms Freedom Act will soon be headed to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.   This is important because this will kick the case on to the US Supreme Court, and I believe that will be a good day.  The Court will then be forced to rule on either freedom or tyranny.  I believe it is high time that we find out just what kind of government we have one way or the other.  For folks who do not know, the Firearms Freedom Act was first passed in Montana and has been spreading to other states.  Many of the folks reading this probably have very little, if any, idea of what this law does.  In a nutshell the states that have passed this law are telling the federal government that if a product (in this case guns) is made, sold, and never leaves the state it was built in that they (the feds) have no authority to regulate said product.  The Federal government uses the Interstate Commerce Clause to regulate everything from guns to chewing gum, and it is the vehicle that Congress and Obama are using to force obamacare on us.  Look at the map that I am embedding in this article.  If your state does not support a Freedom Act then get involved!  Tell the folks running for office if they support this law then they will earn your vote.  This is one of the last chances we have, if not the last chance, to restore power to the states.  Will you support freedom?



Call Congress at 202-224-3121 and tell those goobers that they work for you.  Let them know if they will not support the Firearm (or Commerce to include all products made in a state) Freedom Act then you will do all you can to insure they get a pink slip this November!

Saturday, October 2, 2010

Forget Washington, D.C. Support States Rights canidates

Most folks know that the congressional elections are going to be held on November 2, 2010.  If the talking heads are correct the Republicans expect to take back the House and maybe even the Senate....again that is a big if.  Lets just say for arguments sake they are right and the Republicans do sweep into power in Congress will anything really change?  I submit to you I have my doubts, and you should also.  It was Republicans who passed the so called Patriot Act.  It was Republicans who left a debt of more than one trillion dollars for Obama...who then exploded that debt.  After all, everyone knows when you can't pay your bills that you spend more money that you don't have to get out of the hole, right?  It was Republicans who controlled the House, Senate, and Presidency and left NAFTA intact, who did nothing to stop abortion and good 'ol Dubya along with Juan McCain and Mr. Grahm from South Carolina who pushed for amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants without doing a damned thing to seal the border.  Washington is lost and corrupt.  I you value your freedoms, such as they are, then you must elect Constitutionally minded men and women to state office.  We need governors and sheriffs who will tell the slime balls in Washington to but out of state issues.  We need state Congresspeople and Senators who will fight to restore true power to the States by supporting 10th Amendment bills and let the progressive politicians know they had better keep their hands off our Second Amendment.  If you haven't done so please join the NRA.  Get involved with folks running locally in your state.  If you can't give money give your time  Hand out fliers and make phone calls.  Take folks to the polls and get them registered to vote.  Just don't be fooled; fake Republican "conservatives" can and have done more damage than the most ardent Democrat progressive.

Sorry for the absence

I just wanted to let everyone know who faithfully reads this blog that I'm sorry for being absent.  I've not forgotten about this site or about y'all; the non-virtual world has been somewhat...crazy.  I promise I'll be on a more stable schedule, at least for a while.  Thanks for reading!

Friday, September 3, 2010

I'm going to miss you Pastor Baldwin

As some of you may know, my preacher and role model Pastor Chuck Baldwin has retired from pastoring Crossroad Baptist Church in Pensacola, Florida.  I just want to offer him my heartfelt thanks for a job well done and prayers for his safety and success in whatever the Lord leads him to do in Montana.  Going with Pastor Baldwin are Allan Baker and his family along with the two best friends a guy can have, Tim and Chris Baldwin.  These men have wonderful families and my own family and I have been enriched beyond measure by having these great people in our lives.  Mrs. Connie Baldwin is the very portrait of grace and I wish she could stay and continue teaching Courtney and later Thomas about Jesus.  I can't stop myself from wishing that the Baldwins would stay.  I understand that I'm being selfish, but  the truth is I can't help it.  You would be lucky to have a true friend and God has given me two of the best friends a guy could ask for and one awesome preacher who isn't afraid of stepping on someones toes.  I couldn't ask for a better teacher, mentor, and yes, friend, than Pastor Baldwin.  Pastor, Tim, Chris...I'm gonna miss y'all.  A lot.  When y'all get to Montana give those New World Order types hell for me.  I named this blog after a regiment of elite Roman soldiers who were tasked with defending the eagle banners in a legion.  They were the best, bravest soldiers in a legion.  They had the honor of being called antesignanus.  That is what the Baldwins are.  They are the tip of a very sharp spear leveled at the heart of those who want to destroy the United States and steal the freedoms God Himself has given us.  I stand in awe of these men and the families they have built.  Allan, take care of them.  Tim, keep Chris out of trouble when you can and Chris give 'em hell when Tim isn't watching.  Keep up the fight fellas.

Thursday, September 2, 2010

What does freedom mean to you?

Freedom.  Most people have no idea what that word means.  I am not a lawyer.  I'm not a politician.  I'm not anyone important at all.  All I am is a guy with a family and a computer who is doing his best to make it in an increasingly hostile environment.  The economy is in the toilet and our government seems hellbent on stealing our liberties.  Let me explain what I am talking about.  We have no property rights in the United States.  If you do not believe me I challenge you to stop paying your property taxes.  You had to spend money to buy your property.  If you inherited your house and land then someone else bought it and left it to you, right?  If you buy something it belongs to you, correct?  Wrong.  We have become a nation of helots.  Now I know I have some heads spinning.  What is a helot?  Let me explain it to you.  Helotage was a type of tenant farming practiced in ancient Laconia.  Sparta was the capital of Laconia and every Spartan peer was responsible for a number of helots.  The helots were not slaves; the Spartan master could not sell a helot, however a Spartan could kill a helot who was a trouble maker or got out of line, and the helot was required to give the Spartan a percentage of his or her income in the form of crops.  It was the very first income tax.  And while the helot in theory owned his land if the Spartan peer wasn't paid what he was owed he could take your land.  That is the exact same system we have today.  The government steals via taxation what we produce and takes even more if we own our home, land, or both.  As a result I say there is no private land holdings in this nation.  Again, if you doubt me stop paying your property taxes and see what happens.  Our government is also hostile to gun ownership.  I have the right to own a gun that has been given to me by God, not the government.  If I want to go buy a gun I should be able to do so without being treated like a criminal.  Correct me if I am wrong but aren't we innocent of a crime till proven guilty?  If that is so then explain to me why I must prove I am innocent of a crime before I am allowed to buy a gun?  Listen, I do not want a felon owning a gun or any weapon, period.  But to treat everyone like a felon till they prove they aren't one is simply wrong.  If a felon is caught with a gun then make them go away.  For a long, long time.  For me the freedom is being able to have a pastor being able to slam the government when it is overstepping without said pastor facing harassment from the government.  If I want to buy a gun I go and get the one (or more) that I want and I pay the clerk and they smile and say, "Thanks Mr. West!"  Freedom is keeping the money I earn without the government stealing from me and by God if I want a home it is mine and I shouldn't have to rent it from the government!  I'd love to know what freedom means to you.  Email me at rabuliz@gmail.com and let me know.

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

A Letter

First let me say I'm sorry for the long delay in posting on this blog.  Life has been very uncooperative as of late but now that things are better I'll resume a regular schedule.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'd like to start this article out with a bit about myself.  I was saved as a child through the Lord Jesus Christ.  My granddad lead me to the Lord and I am thankful that one of the jewels he has in his crown in heaven is there due to his leading me to Jesus.  My childhood was chaotic for reasons I will not go into here; suffice it to say the mountains were high and the valleys were very deep.  My teenage years were ones I spent out of fellowship with the Lord.  My heart was hard and cold.  I had a wall of rage that I intentionally fueled.  When you stay angry you don't feel much of anything.  I left high school but thankfully I had brains enough to get a GED and went through two years of vocational school for computer repair.  I continued drifting through life doing my own thing.  I Robby West, the independent man, who needed nobody or no thing....because while I knew there was a hole in my heart I ignored it.  I heard a still small voice calling out to me when I wasn't shouting my rage to the world..  That voice scared me more than anything.  Because it whispered that despite all the things I had done, I was loved.  I, who in my fury told Christ I hated Him, was loved by the One who I was running from.  I believed that I did not deserve love.  I told myself that I would build a better life for myself and that I did not need anyone to help.  I would be strong enough to do it all on my own.  What a fool I was.  It took one mighty event and a few wonderful people to open my eyes and to teach me just how stupid I was and in many ways, still am.  First God worked a miracle and through His grace I was able to forgive my mom and dad for things I went through in my childhood.  The wall of rage started to crumble.  Then, I met a man named Bill who through his life experiences and wisdom was able to guide me through my own life's troubled waters.  I doubt he even knew it at the time, but Bill taught me how to have a friend...and how to be one.  The bricks started to come down-the wall around my heart was breached.  Then I met Kizzy.  I'll never know what it is that she saw or even sees in me, but we fell in love and through her God gave me a family.  My daughter Courtney will be three in November and my son Thomas just turned one.  How the angry son is a father and my own dad is teaching me just how to be a dad, not just a father.  Thank you dad.  I love you.  God also brought a wonderful family into my life.  Through them I have learned to walk with Christ and learned just why He never gave up on me even when I had given up on Him.  Thank you Pastor Baldwin for teaching me God's Word and for helping me become the man I am today.  Thank you Tim and Chris.  Especially Tim and Chris.  A guy can never ask for better friends or spiritual mentors.
You both make this Christian walk look so easy!  And man can y'all sing!  Thanks to these awesome people whom God has used as tools the wall of fury around my heart has been breached finally and Jesus has freed me from my sins and my self imposed torments.  And I have my mom again.  Thank you Jesus.  I love you mom.  I forgive you.  And I forgive myself at long last.  I know this is a rambling letter but this is in my heart and I needed to share it.  If you are running from Christ, take my advice.  Stop.  Face Him.  Allow Him into your heart.  Make him your Savior.  Through Christ our chains are broken and made truly free.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

A Failed Experiment Gives Occasion to Restore Freedom -- by Timothy Baldwin

Attorney Timothy Baldwin has granted me permission to post his articles on this site and I am very greatful.  If you are not reading his site already I encourage you to do so.  Visit his site by clicking here.  Also, check out his book Freedom for a Change.  I hope you enjoy the read!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no question that the United States Constitution was considered to be an EXPERIMENT. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists alike admitted it was an experiment, and it has been described as such ever since. Evidently, Americans use the term not knowing what it actually means or implies. So, what was it that made this form of government experimental? Before answering the question, let us initially identify what was NOT unique about the U.S. Constitution–aspects that many probably consider to exhibit the unique and singular greatness of the U.S. Constitution, but in reality, are not unique at all and were in fact borrowed.
First, the separation of powers in the federal government was not new. That element of government had been around literally since Moses governed Israel in Canaan. Great Britain exercised a separation of powers as well: executive power in the Monarch, legislative power in Parliament and judicial power in the courts. Second, that the form was a democratic-republic was not new. The European states and countries had exercised self-government to a greater degree than just about any other people in the history of the world. Thirdly, the experiment was not in having a bill of rights. Such an acknowledgement of people’s rights had existed in the European countries since the Magna Charta in 1215. Neither did the experiment lie in such components as term limits, voting, limited government authority, a two-house congress and the like. All of these had been well established throughout the governments of the world. All of those aspects were a given, but were only debated in terms of preference and compromise.  The U.S. Constitution was in fact not new on virtually every component of its composure. So, what made it an EXPERIMENT, such that the freedom it (along with the State constitutions already in place) was supposed to protect was very susceptible to abuse and destruction? What was it about the U.S. Constitution that would transform its character from one governing the consent of the governed to one governing by the force of the Supreme Sword of the federal government? What was it about the nature of the constitution that carried with it serious risk in its implementation? And indeed it was risky, for why would the form of government be considered an experiment if the risks (now and the future) would not seriously jeopardize freedom? If the potential abuses were not serious in nature and scope, then there would be no need in describing the form of government as an experiment.  In short, the EXPERIMENT was the attempt to form distinct parallel lines of powers to the State governments and Federal government with respect to their separate delegations; to allow “two sovereigns” to “occupy” the same territory over the same people; and to entrust each representative in those governments to stay within its own sphere of delegation; to allow for a standing military in the hands of the federal government and a militia army of the people in the hands of the States. This was the experiment in the world of political and social science: having two “sovereigns” with completely different purposes over the same people throughout different states with different interests. For many during that day, it was literally considered impossible; thus, the experimental nature of attempting to.  I submit, that while a good run was made of the experiment, the results of the test are in, and the experiment proves to have failed. I understand that it is hard for Americans to reach this conclusion for a variety of reasons, and this is not surprising, for as our founders said, “all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.” After a while, this disposition to suffer reaches the level of voluntary and consensual slavery. To avoid that treachery, freedom-loving Americans need to get over themselves and their substance-less pride and do what is right for freedom’s sake.  Do I love America? Absolutely. I love its history, legacy and heritage. I study it every day. But I love freedom more–freedom that I want to experience myself, not just read about in history books. I can assure you, however, I have no permanent affection towards forms of government. They are merely tools to reach an end, namely freedom. Government is our servant and we its master. When government becomes destructive to freedom, I have no qualms about abolishing the existing government and forming new government to secure what God has granted to me, my wife, my child, my family, my community and my body-politic.  Do I believe that the U.S. Constitution equates to freedom? Absolutely not; no more than I believe that a law acknowledging my right to defend myself grants me the right to blow a would-be rapist to smithereens if he were to attempt to hurt my wife and child. I believe what human history proves, that a constitution is only one of the measures in society to protect freedom; that a “constitution may happen to be free, and the [citizen] not” (Charles de Baron Montesquieu and Julian Hawthorne, ed., The Spirit of Laws: The World’s Great Classics, vol. 1 (London: The London Press) 183); and that a constitution can become practically useless in restraining government. I believe that constitutions should be formed and re-formed by a body-politic as they deem it necessary to protect themselves.  I do not understand the mentality of those shallow-thinking citizens who have the bumper sticker approach to government, “Support America. Be American!” as if to say, resistance to government or abolishing government contradicts our patriotic duty and is un-American. To the contrary, doing your patriotic duty means being ever vigilant and honest in your evaluation of political and societal conditions. It means being liberal-minded (not in the political-party sense) in our approach to government, and if necessary, instituting new forms.  Is it so surprising that the societal and political changes over 250 years would completely change the character and nature of a union and the application of the “Supreme Law of the Land”? The union and the U.S. Constitution were actually bound for deconstruction, just as all governments are and all political unions that attempt to be perpetual. That the Tower-of-Babel-mentality can be successful mocks common sense and historical proof. Human nature does not allow it. The form of government of the U.S. Constitution was an experiment, admittedly not destined to live forever, for as soon as society’s character and nature change, so does the constitution governing those people.  Do you think that the philosophy, beliefs, cultures and morals of a people can substantially change but the “Supreme Law of the Land” remain the same as to those completely different people in completely different times and circumstances? Get real. Justice Joseph Story, one of the most nationalistic-minded of the founding generation, admits the same thing. Concerning the inevitable fall of the political experiment, the U.S. Constitution, he says,  “[T]he fabric [of the constitution] may fall; for the work of man is perishable. Nay, it must fall, if there be not the vital spirit in the people, which can alone nourish, sustain, and direct, all its movements.” (Joseph Story, A Familiar Exposition of the United States Constitution, (New York, NY, Harper and Brother, 1868 reprinted), 100-101.)  This “vital spirit” of freedom has so long been absent in this country and in such a shortage of knowledge, virtue and energy that to suggest freedom can be restored in America through the current union and form of government calls into question the judgment of those who honestly hold that opinion.  Does this mean that freedom cannot be restored in America? Absolutely not. Freedom can be restored and it will, but only in those places where the people believe in and practice independence, honesty and self-government enough to part with the federal government that has filled the gap of the people’s irresponsibility and lust for comfort and money with tyranny and oppression.  Does the U.S. Constitution contain good principles? It sure does. It contains principles that had been accepted through political enlightened thought for centuries, just as the British Constitution did. Yet, despite containing good principles, the founding generation believed that constitutions notwithstanding, there comes a time when to remain in a political association shirks our duty to God and man.  Do I believe the U.S. Constitution is perfect? Absolutely not. Neither did the founders as they said they were only forming a “more perfect union,” in anticipation that their posterity (and even current generation) would retain the priority of their virtue, morals and good faith. This description of the U.S. Constitution necessarily means that there could be a better constitution; a better form of government; and an even more perfect union. But such a “better” government will not be obtained by keeping a union so large with a constitution that “grants” to the federal government plenary power to govern hundreds of millions of people for the supposed “general welfare” of “all” and to pass any and all laws “necessary and proper” in the “pursuance” of (e.g. “living constitution”) such ends; and where the people in the States have lost virtually all control over internal polity and interest in the name of the “Supreme Law of the Land” imposed upon us since Chief Justice John Marshall rendered his opinions in the early 1800s.  I propose this truth: a constitution is to be judged by its practical merits and revealing experience and not upon some indeterminable “intent” of what the “founding fathers meant.” Moreover, I ask, which founding fathers? The ones that preferred a monarchical form of government and believed the U.S. Constitution to be a consolidating effect upon the people as one body-politic? The ones that believed that Great Britain’s form of government was the best in the world and should be replicated here and who thought the U.S. Constitution was a stepping-stone to that end? The ones that imposed nationalistic practices in the federal government even during the first term of the United States’ first president? Hoping for a return to “what the founders intended” is chasing a moving shadow and ignores the reality of what this union has become “in pursuance of” the U.S. Constitution, all the intentions in the world notwithstanding.  You may argue that those nationalistic-supremacy ideas were not the ones accepted by the founding fathers (which ones?), yet history proves that the federal government has reached its current status largely with the consent of all three federal branches throughout the past two centuries, in the authority of the U.S. Constitution, even from the very beginning. Has the constitution stopped this power crave and expansion? Do you think that the U.S. Supreme Court Judges have not put good reasoning to their opinions when they analyze the constitutional powers granted to the federal government? Are they all just a bunch of idiots or conspiratorial maniacs, or has the constitution not adequately maintained the lines of parallel power between people and federal government and between State government and federal government, that being the very core of this constitutional experiment?  The federal government even fought a Civil War against fellow Americans to retain this “constitutional” Nationalistic Supremacy over the people of the States to govern themselves, all under the authority of the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Constitution’s effect to this national-supremacy-end has only intensified since then and gotten progressively worse. If it took over two hundred years to get to this point, which you may perceive as constitutional degradation, how long do you think it would take to get back to 1787-intent using the same constitution that has empowered the federal government during those 200-plus years? Let us shed these illusions based merely in the wishing and not in the reality.  America’s founding generation told their posterity that this form of government was an EXPERIMENT. Like them, we should recognize the reality that one day new forms of government would need to be instituted for freedom’s sake, just as they showed us in the Declaration of Independence, which cited not the English Constitution as a basis of their right to live freely, but the Natural Laws of God. These laws are based upon the principles self-preservation, -defense, -improvement and -government. We, their posterity, must make similar decisions, using their good example, to secure freedom for ourselves and our posterity. May we endeavor to experiment in freedom once again.

You can build a mosque at Ground Zero when we can build a church in Mecca

I am so sick and tired of the double standards in this country.  I am sick and tired of having to bow down and kiss some group's posterior because they are a so called "minority."  Since when does being a minority mean that the majority of people has to give a damn what you think, want, or say?  Now I know I have some one's attention.  "Aha, Robby is a bigot, I just knew it!," is what some of you who are reading this post are now thinking.  To you I say you need to get informed.  Just what am I talking about?  Allow me to explain.  How many of you folks remember September 11, 2001?  What were you doing when you first heard about the attacks?  How did you respond?  Imagine back then of someone told you that a group of Muslims lead by a radical imam would want to build a mosque at the ground zero site in New York on say...September the 12?  (for those of you who may need a reminder it was not nineteen Southern Baptists or Catholics who hijacked three planes and killed more than three thousand people by playing kamikaze)?  Here we are nine years out and that is just what we are now facing.  The groups building the mosque paid $4.85 million for the property.  The building itself was damaged during the attacks on September the 11th and construction costs are expected to run around $100 million dollars.  Now that in and of itself raises a question as to just where is all this money coming from?  We have part of the answer.  The Dutch government is actually financing part of the project.  Read about that nugget here.Mayor Bloomburg of New York City doesn't seem to care and says that folks like me questioning this project are promoting religious intolerance.  So be it.  I am asking and looking for answers to questions as I am writing this article.  I hope you will join me in the search as well.  Take a look at the wikipedea link here.  Then we have to talk about the imam himself, one Feisal Abdul Rauf who says that the United States was an accessory to the crime and has stated he wishes the United States was more Sharia compliant.  I say to hell with that.  This nation is built on Christian law and if Mister Rauf wants to live according to Sharia law he is more than welcome to live in Saudi Arabia or Iran.
Listen the point is that Ground Zero is holy ground.  Thousands of our countrymen died there and if followers of Islam want to build a mosque there in the name of building briges and making amends then I'm all for it...as long as Christians can build churches in Mecca and other Islamic cities.  Fair is fair.  Read more about the good imam here.

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Thank God for Michael Savage

In this brave new age of tolerance and diversity someone would never be condemned because of an opinion.  Never.  Trust me.  As a society we are taught the values of acceptance of views and cultures different then what we grew up with.Now, if you believe that crap I have a bridge I want to sell you in San Fransisco, home of the greatest media personality alive today, Doctor Michael Savage.  Doctor Savage is a dose of fresh air in this otherwise polluted and watered down age of so-called "conservative" media and commentary.  In a brave and enlightened age such as our own where every opinion is to be heard out and respected that does not apply to the traditional standard.  What do I mean?  Allow me to explain it to you. Doctor Savage believes in a few simple things like I do, such as:
  • Marriage between one man and one woman
  • Borders, Language, Culture are the building blocks of any nation
  • Holds that the Second Amendment is an individual right
  • Supports the English Only Movement
  • Holds both political parties are corrupt (hello Scott Brown)
  • States the fact that Islam is the enemy of the United States
  • Stands up to CAIR and other Islamic groups that mean harm to traditional American values
I have a link to Doctor Savage's website on my links section and I hope you check his page out.  You will find news there that is hard to find and very relevant to the days we now live in.  The views that Doctor Savage have are so controversial that he is banned from entering Great Britain.  Read that again.  This man has committed no crime whatsoever.  He hasn't robbed anyone, killed anyone, or slandered anyone.  For standing for traditional values and having the balls to tell the truth he is banned for his opinion!  So much for tolerance.  I ask the readers of this site to do a few easy things. 
  1. Go to his website and read about him yourself.  The link is listed on my link section.
  2. Listen to the man on the radio and YouTube
  3. Buy his book Banned in Britain
This man deserves our support and that being said this writer is glad to give it.  Listen to him, and if you agree our country can't survive without Borders, Language, Culture , believe that marriage is between a man and a woman then I beg you to offer him your support as well.  God bless Michael Savage!

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Where is the conservative media?

Have you ever heard of Cedra Crenshaw? If not, don't be surprised most people haven't. Why is that? Here is a link to her website http://www.cedracrenshaw.com/. I encourage the people who read this blog to pass the word about this young woman and to send her emails of support. If you live in her district in Illinois I recommend you vote for her. Now, you are probably wondering just why I'm involving myself in this race at all. The answer is because the Chicago machine is doing its best to not even allow Mrs. Crenshaw to be on the ballot. I find it ironic that the left is always preaching to us about diversity. According to them it is folks like me who are on the right who are intolerant bigots with the closed minds. What hypocrites they are! I guess that if you are a black woman who is a conservative there is no room for you. Where is the NAACP? The Southern Poverty Law Center? Isn't the fact that the powers that be in Chicago are doing everything they can to keep a black woman off the ballot a racist act? Well, is it? If Illinois was dominated by Republicans that would be the charge levied. Why do the folks in the left fear her so much? Could it be because she is a black woman who supports the Second Amendment? Balanced budgets? Budget cuts? Folks this is the kind of candidate we need to support! Now here is the rub. The Will County Electoral Board voted along party lines to remove Mrs. Crenshaw from the ballot in November. What an outrage! If you know folks who live in Illinois email the information about this woman to them. If you live in this district then contact the board and raise holy hell. That is the only language these slime balls understand. Pass the word about this wonderful woman and maybe together we can defeat the Chicago Machine.

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Pride and shame in America

This last week I found two under reported stories that touched my heart and I'd like to share them with you now. The first story is about a homeless man who noticed an American flag that had been blown down during a storm. This man, reportedly named Gustus Bozarth doesn't have what we take for granted. He doesn't have a roof over his head. He doesn't have a comfortable climate controlled room to relax in while he surfs the 'net or watches TV in a recliner. His home is on the street under the hot Texas sun. I found out about this man while looking on YouTube and I'd rather talk about Mr. Bozarth than those idiot Black Panthers. How many of us, myself included, gripe and complain and bemoan the unfairness of life while living in this great (for now admittedly) country? I talk about patriotism on this blog. Mr. Bozarth lived it. During a storm a flag was blown down. Watch what he does. This video moved me and I have to admit I was teared up by it. Would I have done what he did? I honestly don't know. I stand in awe of Mr. Bozarth and with God's help I'll reach the level of love for this country that he already has. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxeAyW6yI28 He folds those flags with as much love and respect as he could. Would I have done what he did if I had seen those flags on the ground? I know not. And that admission fills me with shame. God bless you Mr. Bozarth. I found the story reported. It had been buried and it is a shame, this story needs to live on. Take a moment and read the story. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/07/07/people-search-way-donate-homeless-man-saves-flag/?test=latestnews

The second great American I want to talk to you about is Pastor Ron Baity. He is the pastor of Berean Baptist Church in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Pastor Baity is a hero of the faith and deserves the support in ways of tithes and offerings because when he ended his prayer in the House of Represenatives in North Carolina he did a terrible and controversial thing: he ended his prayer in Jesus' name. North Carolina is one of those Bible belt states, you know the states with a church on every corner and as red (as in Republican) as you can get. And a pastor gets the shaft because he dared to pray in Jesus' name. Where is the outrage? Where are those proud Republican Christians? The silence tells the story. Most churches in America today are as dead as a tomb. The Moral Majority has no strength left, its political might has been all but spent. Jesus was crucified before by the Romans at the behest of Jewish religious leaders who feared Him. Now he is being crucified by apostate and cowardly Christians at the alter of political correctness and self deception. Thank God that Pastor Baity is made of sterner stuff. America we need more men like Pastor Baity and Mr. Bozarth. To the people of North Carolina in particular, if you belong to one of those social club churches who compromises the Gospel of Christ I urge you to support Pastor Baity with your tithes and let your own pastors know if they don't grow a spine you will no longer support him. If we as Americans don't support true American patriots like these two men then we have no right to complain about what we get. All evil needs to get stronger is for good people to stay silent. Now you have a choice to make. What will you do? Read about these sad events in North Carolina here. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/07/09/pastor-yanked-capitol-jesus-prayer/?test=latestnews. See an interview here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47bRY7yJ0QA

Thursday, July 8, 2010

No civil rights protection for whites

As some of you might know, back in 2008 there was a group of New Black Panthers who were actively intimidating voters in a polling place in Philadelphia. For the most part this story has been totally ignored by the news media. Now, allow me to paint you a picture. What would the response have been if there were a couple of Klansman or Neo-Nazis brandishing weapons at a voting place and claiming to be "security?" You and I both know the police and media response would have been overwhelming. I've done some looking and found the actual video on election day of when these events took place.

You can see the man with the nightstick in the first video STANDING IN FRONT OF THE DOOR for God's sake and the people watching the polls didn't seem to mind that. Now, watch what happens when the reporter goes up there: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thqk8kDK6Z0&feature=related. I guess they don't mind Black Panthers with nightsticks standing at the door but reporters are truly dangerous and need to move. What an outrage.

Now, I know some of y'all are probably thinking why am I even writing about this. Let me tell you. The vote is the cornerstone of our republic. It is our voice. Most countries in the world (North Korea, China, Cube for example) do not allow the vote. Dictators don't allow the vote. Look at what happened in Iran last year with its elections. Reports from anywhere between eighty and over two hundred protesters were killed because a election was rigged and they had the gall to stand up against it. Let me be clear. I do not care who you are, if you are an intimidating factor at a voting place you have crossed the line and it is a civil rights violation. So the Department of Justice will take care of this problem right? We will get to that in a bit. First lets learn some about the New Black Panther Party. Here is the link to the groups website. Read the statement and then you will get an idea of what this group is all about. http://www.newblackpanther.com/intro.html

The argument on the website is that the man with the nightstick was suspended for his roll for a time (he is once again a member of the party) and that as an organisation the NBPP holds zero liability. That is a bunch of hogwash. I am a member of the NRA. If I was wearing NRA garb and tried the garbage that this guy did the NRA would be in just as much trouble as ( rightfully so I might add ) be in. And after getting kicked out of the NRA I highly doubt they'd let me back in. The Panther was not kicked out, he was suspended and according to the statement on the website is once again a full member. Nice huh? Here is some background on the group: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party

Now to the Department of Justice. Incredibly, the DoJ has decided NOT to bring charges against the NBPP for civil rights violations (i.e. voter intimidation) siting no evidence despite videos from cell phones and Fox News showing a man with a nightstick in front of the doors of the voting area. Take a look at this interview. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BemSmTNDxU&feature=related. To this writer, it seems that if you are white you can not be the victim of a civil rights violation brought about by a minority. If this is indeed true then there is corruption in one of our most powerful departments and it must be stamped out.

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Tolerance must work both ways

I am so sick of being lectured about being tolerant by people who don't practice what they preach. Now, I know I have some attention. "What," you are asking? "He's not talking about guns this time?!" That's right, I'm not. I am talking about how the enemies of our culture, of our country, and our way of life are using our own principles as a weapon to destroy us. Let me give you some examples.

That last link should make your blood boil. There are plans to build a mosque in sight of the World Trade Center and the dedication for that mosque would be on September the 11th! Naturally there is outrage (and rightly so!) to this plan, and naturally the people who are against this scheme are being labeled with the racist/bigot brush. Let me point out some things about how tolerant our Muslim friends are.

And don't you dare draw a picture of the "prophet" Mohammad. If you want to see some people practicing peaceful Islam and showing that tolerance that they want then take a look. Michael Savage (the first link) has the right idea.

Look at this video. Our government looks to Fatah to lead the Palestinians and be a peace partner. Now watch this and tell me just how in the world you expect that to happen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXyh8WeRYiE&feature=related

This woman explains why genocide is perfectly alright with her.

You can't open a church in Islamic countries. You can't witness for Christ in Islamic countries. I am so sick and tired of America being portrayed as the world villain. I am sick and tired of having to be tolerant while the people demanding that tolerance have none for themselves. The people of the United States need to wake up. We are surrounded by people who seek to destroy our way of life. If we as a people don't awaken to the dangers of corrupt politicians and other enemies who seek our end, the only ones we will be able to blame for our doom is ourselves.

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Once again only one vote dictates freedom or tyrany

Yesterday, June 28, 2010, is a day that will go down in history. Let me tell you why. In a five to four vote the Supreme Court of the United States struck down the Chicago gun ban and ruled that:

  • The Second Amendment is an individual right and a civil right (like the right to vote for example)
  • We, as Americans, have a right to self defense
  • Ruled that the US Constitution supersedes state and local law

I'd just like to touch on these three points. First, all the rights in our Bill of Rights are individual rights. When the Constitution says people that is exactly what it means. The people. You and me. For example how could anyone say that the word people in the First Amendment be different than the word people in the Second? People are people right? Sadly, there are congressmen, senators, and even Supreme Court judges who make the argument that the people in the First Amendment are not the same people in the Second or even the Tenth Amendments. Just how they reach that conclusion boggles the mind, but they do. Just one vote certified that the people are indeed the people. That is scary. What would have happened if Justice Kennedy had ruled the other way? I shudder in dread and fear at the thought. Oh, and just one more thing. Justice Sotomayor who was nominated to the Court by President Obama stated she believed the Second Amendment was an individual right but voted for the gun ban in Chicago. So much for those individual rights huh? Here are some links about the case.

Mayor Daley says he will rewrite the ordnance and this writer believes that most likely what he will do is charge insane prices for training and a license so that the majority of lower to middle class Americans in the city simply would not be able to afford to buy a gun. That is just my opinion but I'll be a bearded gnome if he doesn't try a scheme like that.

Secondly, to affirm that we, as Americans, have the right to self defense all one needs to do is read what the Founders wrote on the subject. See some quotes here. http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

The most troubling aspect of this for me is that the Court ruled that what it says supersedes State and local laws. That logic is flawed. The truth is that every State is independent and is a part of a federal republic. That is why the States have constitutions themselves. The United States Constitution is binding on the federal government only. Why you might ask does this matter? Freedom won yesterday, didn't it? No, not really. What happened yesterday is that one vote prevented the death of the Second Amendment and allowed the federal government to cede itself more power. And that is bad news for everyone.

Friday, June 25, 2010

Once again the Korean War is forgotten but Michael Jackson is remembered.

The Forgotten War fought in Korea began today in 1950 but you'd be very hard pressed to find anything about this bloody war in our schools or even our bookstores today. The insult is huge and frankly we, the American people, should be ashamed that we've allowed this outrage to begin much less to continue. However, that is exactly what has happened. Our veterans of this terrible war (my dad is a combat wounded Korean War vet himself) are largely ignored by the history books and the media. In President Obama's speech given today at 8am central time in which he talked about the housing market there was not one mention of the war that began so long ago. Korean War vets take being forgotten stoically. My dad has said time and again to me, "That's just the way it is." That is not good enough for me and by God it shouldn't be good enough for you either. Lets cut the crap and talk some numbers:

  • A three year long war begins
  • That war claims 36,516 American lives
  • 92,134 American servicemen are wounded in this conflict
  • 8,176 Americans are MIA
  • 7,245 Americans are taken as POWs

The Korean War lasted from 1950 to 1953 and I don't give a damn that the United Nations called the war a "police action." It was a shooting war that claimed the lives of the sons and daughters of the United States. It was the first time that the sons and daughters of this country were asked to give their lives in a war without a congressional declaration of war. It was the first time that Americans were asked to give their lives for a UN mandate and the bureaucrats at the UN don't even have the decency to call it a war. A police action? Give me a break. The war began when communist North Korea launched a war of aggression against the Republic of Korea (South Korea) and our brave fighting men fought and bled and died defending a poor country that simply did not have the ability to defend itself and we here in America, for the most part, don't even remember this even happened. It infuriates me. It shames me. And by God, it should shame you too. We owe our fathers and grandfathers the honor that has been denied them for far to long.

To add insult to injury is when people in the public light say straight faced that World War II was the last war America (I guess that forgot about Granada, Panama, and the First Gulf War) won or dare to say that we lost the Korean War. How dare they. LOOK AT A MAP! IS SOUTH KOREA STILL THERE? YES IT IS! WE DID NOT LOOSE. South Korea is very much independent and went from being one of the poorest nations on Earth to one of the richest. Everyone in the public sphere who has ever uttered that slander owes a much higher debt than those of us who have forgotten this war even happened. That statement is an out and out lie, a slander, and it is repugnant. Thankfully the people of South Korea haven't forgotten the sacrifice that our dads and granddads made. In Vietnam, South Koreans bled and died alongside American soldiers. Even today in Afghanistan and Iraq the warriors of South Korea are there helping shoulder the burden and this writer for one thanks them.

The final insult on this hallowed day is the fact that while people have forgotten and/or ignored the fact that a war that claimed so many American lives (and took 138,000 South Korean lives) we remember that Michael Jackson, that great American artist died a year ago today. Last time I checked the major networks are planning a three day tribute to...no, not America's finest who were asked to give everything for a foreign country, but to...Michael Jackson. How the mighty have fallen. How the hell are we going to take our country back? People talk big about liberty and freedom and fighting the new world order and all this other big talk but let me tell you something. Until we take back our homes and teach our posterity just what a true hero is (and Michael Jackson IS NOT a hero) we are just kidding ourselves. The next time you see a Korean War vet, and there aren't many left, walk up to him, look him in the eye. Shake his hand and say, "Thank you sir. Others may have forgotten what you and yours did, but for me and my house, we remember."

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Could there be amnesty without Congress having a say?

There are whispers from Washington hinting that President Obama, our Glorious Leader, has hatched a scheme for illegal immigration. The word has it that Obama is planning on using an Executive Order and bypass Congress all together and make a law granting amnesty through the use of his Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano grant amnesty to illegals. Who cares that the Constitution says only Congress can make law, it was written by a bunch of old dead racist white guys anyway. When should something technical like say...a law, be an impediment to those wonderful folks who are boldly leading America to a new and shining future with over $13 trillion in debt and free health care for all! Laws should only be followed by us peasants after all....

In all seriousness if Obama was able to do this, it would be a disaster and a Constitutional crisis of epic proportions. Thankfully, even some of the drones in Washington may be taking notice. Nobody likes to lose power after all, and maybe that will be our best ally against this power play. The greed of politicians against the greed of politicians. Anyway I'm rambling again (see what only three hours of sleep does to a guy?) Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa and eight other senators got wind of this power grab and have written a letter to the president.

Here is a link to the letter sent to President Obama.
http://hatch.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=DataPipes.ViewPDF&Id=5c7c629c-1b78-be3e-e0c6-81b26b437781

If you care about illegal immigration and the rule of law like I do then we must all take action now to stop this. Call your senator and spread the word on this story. It is grossly under reported. It kind of makes one wonder why that is, doesn't it? One has to wonder if California would still be able to cut millions of dollars in welfare payments to illegals if they were granted amnesty. What? You didn't know about that? OHere is the link take a gander for yourself.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2009/jul/illegal-aliens-get-monthly-welfare-checks-0
Anyway I'm sure that La Raza and The Home Depot, not to mention the Democratic Party would be thrilled to take advantage of this executive order if it is allowed to happen.

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Why do we have a 10th Amendment to our Constitution?

Like many of you, I am a product of our public school system. I learned my ABC's and 123's and how to read a book. It is that last thing that I thank God about the most. Literacy is second only to salvation as far as the gifts God has given to man, and it is high time that people start reading books and get educated and involved. I've read the Constitution and till the last couple of years I read the 10th Amendment but I never really read it if you follow me. I never got it. It never clicked. The amendment is simple, and maybe that is why most Americans, myself included never even made an effort to study it. The amendment says, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Now that I'm a bit older and have read more books I learned a few things. One, history isn't taught in our school system. Civics class is a joke. And lastly, I was dumb as a rock when it came to how government worked. I always have believed in states rights and I knew that before the War Between the States (also incorrectly called the Civil War) that the Southern States seceded from the Union in the belief that they already independent States and had the power to do so. I'm not going to get into the cause of the war in this article, but I will tell you now that if you were taught it was over slavery then you are wrong. That is a bald faced lie and you need to go to a library and get educated. The Southern States fought a war that ultimately took one million American lives because they believed that the Federal government has zero right to tell a state what to do in an internal matter. Read that again. Now, scroll up and read the 10th Amendment and lastly I'd like you to read the Constitution. After you do that come back to this article for some more truth that will either make you think either:

  • I'm a right wing evil slime ball who wants to raise an army and overthrow the government
  • A very confused Redneck (my wife is black for those who think I'm a racist. If that doesn't make your head blow up I'm not sure what will)
  • Maybe this guy Robby has stumbled unto something

Here is some truth. First, our Founding Fathers were secessionists. Gasp. I said it. What did they advocate and fight a war for? Yes, a war for the Independence of 13 colonies. That meant that they had to secede from the British Empire for that to happen. Did you learn that tidbit in school? Neither did I. There was not a plan at all for a single united nation with a strong federal government. The Articles of Confederation was the first attempt by the Founders to join the States (the capital 'S' is intentional) info a political union was a flop. That is why they had a convention and now have the US Constitution that formed the Federal government. Now, if you read the Constitution like I asked you to, you'll notice somethings that just don't mesh with our current system of government.

  1. The Federal government has ZERO authority over State issues
  2. The Federal government has ZERO authority to do -anything- in regards to education
  3. The Supreme Court has ZERO authority over State constitutions or internal State affairs
  4. There isn't -anything- about a Federal Reserve Bank. *gasp* Why not? BECAUSE THE FED IS NOT A PART OF THE GOVERNMENT! They are as much a part of the US government as FedEX is.

Now, I simply do not have the education to be as articulate as I feel this article requires, so I am going to ask my readers to do some more homework now that you've read the Constitution....yeah I know, great, more homework. Well, here it goes. It is very easy. Watch these two YouTube videos first.

The speaker is Timothy Baldwin, the head of the Liberty Defense League. He is one of the most brilliant people I've ever had the chance to speak too, and I am reading his book Freedom for a Change. It is available on Amazon.com and I'll include the links so you can look at the book and I do hope, buy the book. This is a free commercial by the way, I have not been paid to promote this book and even if the offer was made I'd refuse it. It is just a damned good book. Buy it. Read it. Get educated.

Monday, June 21, 2010

The Home Depot is not a friend of the United States or Christians

The world's largest home improvement company, Home Depot, has some explaining to do. In the name of diversity, the big shots at Home Depot have partnered with a racist group called La Raza. For some background on La Raza look at these following links:

It is this writers opinion that it would be more forgivable for The Home Depot to support the New Black Panther Party than these thugs. How is support for this group any different than supporting the KKK? If there is a difference then please explain it to me. The Home Depot is in bed with an organization that actively supports socialism at best and communism at the worse. They give dollars that you may spend for that new grill, or light bulb, or pipe, to a group that wants to dismantle our country. Here are the links on Home Depot's own website bragging about supporting these thugs, these vermin.

As repugnant as what I have just told you, it doesn't end there. It has come to light that The Home Depot contributed at least $5,000 to the Nashville Gay Pride Parade and set up craft booths for children at these parades. Sadly, Nashville isn't the only city that The Home Depot has done this in. Atlanta, Portland, and Kansas City, among others, have had The Home Depot financially support these displays of perversion all in the name of diversity. Take a look at the corporate website again and once again you see a public embrace of this sinful lifestyle by The Home Depot.

Now before anyone goes off half cocked and starts the whole bigot attack let me be clear about something. I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU DO IN YOUR OWN HOME! However, when this type of perversion is going on in public and children are exposed to this perverse lifestyle it is sickening and in this writers opinion it is tantamount to child abuse.

I'll close with this thought. If you are a patriot who loves your country, if you are a Bible believing Christian, send The Home Depot a message they can not afford to ignore in this economy. Contact your local store and email the corporate offices. Tell them if they insist on supporting La Raza or these Gay Pride Days then they will not have your dollars. Money talks louder than emails and phone calls after all.

The Home Depot can be contacted at 1-800-466-3337.

Guns would NEVER be taken by the government if Republicans controled it...no...honest...

One thing I've noticed is that a lot of people blame all the problems we've built up (like a 13 trillion dollar debt) on the Obama regime. However, I'd like to point out a few tidbits that happened under President Bush.

  • The Patriot Act
  • Two undeclared wars. The Constitution requires Congress make a Declaration of War. Just having a vote that says go ahead doesn't pass the smell test.
  • An unprecedented expansion of government due to TSA and the Department of Homeland Security. Don't you feel safer?
  • Bush pressed for amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants
  • Bush started the bailout ball rolling down the slippery socialist slope we now find ourselves on.
  • And now this little bombshell. Guns were taken by state and federal police and national guard troops at the behest of Ray Nagin and the Chief of Police Warren Riley. The silence from the White House would deafen anyone. Here are some links so you can see and read for yourself what happened. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4,
  • http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/08/national/nationalspecial/08cnd-storm.html,
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm5PC7z79-8&feature=related

This was pure martial law. Where was President Bush at when all this was happening? The Second Amendment was written for situations like what happened after Katrina. In short, the Right to Keep and Bear Arms doesn't have a thing to do with rabbit hunting. Now tell me, if a "gun friendly" president was in office then with a "gun friendly" Congress what would happen now if another disaster struck? Would Obama come out in defense of your rights? If you believe he would I have a bridge I'll sell you in Utah.