Antesignanus was a designation in a Roman legion for the soldiers charged with defending the banner; ie. the leaders. We need patriots who are willing to take a stand and join the fight. Do you have what it takes to be a member of the antesignanus? Are you willing to preserve freedom or live as a slave?
Thanks for visiting
Friday, November 5, 2010
Where is the ACLU?
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Last Chance for the Republicans
Monday, October 4, 2010
Firearms Freedom Act Goes to Court
Call Congress at 202-224-3121 and tell those goobers that they work for you. Let them know if they will not support the Firearm (or Commerce to include all products made in a state) Freedom Act then you will do all you can to insure they get a pink slip this November!
Saturday, October 2, 2010
Forget Washington, D.C. Support States Rights canidates
Sorry for the absence
Friday, September 3, 2010
I'm going to miss you Pastor Baldwin
Thursday, September 2, 2010
What does freedom mean to you?
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
A Letter
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd like to start this article out with a bit about myself. I was saved as a child through the Lord Jesus Christ. My granddad lead me to the Lord and I am thankful that one of the jewels he has in his crown in heaven is there due to his leading me to Jesus. My childhood was chaotic for reasons I will not go into here; suffice it to say the mountains were high and the valleys were very deep. My teenage years were ones I spent out of fellowship with the Lord. My heart was hard and cold. I had a wall of rage that I intentionally fueled. When you stay angry you don't feel much of anything. I left high school but thankfully I had brains enough to get a GED and went through two years of vocational school for computer repair. I continued drifting through life doing my own thing. I Robby West, the independent man, who needed nobody or no thing....because while I knew there was a hole in my heart I ignored it. I heard a still small voice calling out to me when I wasn't shouting my rage to the world.. That voice scared me more than anything. Because it whispered that despite all the things I had done, I was loved. I, who in my fury told Christ I hated Him, was loved by the One who I was running from. I believed that I did not deserve love. I told myself that I would build a better life for myself and that I did not need anyone to help. I would be strong enough to do it all on my own. What a fool I was. It took one mighty event and a few wonderful people to open my eyes and to teach me just how stupid I was and in many ways, still am. First God worked a miracle and through His grace I was able to forgive my mom and dad for things I went through in my childhood. The wall of rage started to crumble. Then, I met a man named Bill who through his life experiences and wisdom was able to guide me through my own life's troubled waters. I doubt he even knew it at the time, but Bill taught me how to have a friend...and how to be one. The bricks started to come down-the wall around my heart was breached. Then I met Kizzy. I'll never know what it is that she saw or even sees in me, but we fell in love and through her God gave me a family. My daughter Courtney will be three in November and my son Thomas just turned one. How the angry son is a father and my own dad is teaching me just how to be a dad, not just a father. Thank you dad. I love you. God also brought a wonderful family into my life. Through them I have learned to walk with Christ and learned just why He never gave up on me even when I had given up on Him. Thank you Pastor Baldwin for teaching me God's Word and for helping me become the man I am today. Thank you Tim and Chris. Especially Tim and Chris. A guy can never ask for better friends or spiritual mentors.
You both make this Christian walk look so easy! And man can y'all sing! Thanks to these awesome people whom God has used as tools the wall of fury around my heart has been breached finally and Jesus has freed me from my sins and my self imposed torments. And I have my mom again. Thank you Jesus. I love you mom. I forgive you. And I forgive myself at long last. I know this is a rambling letter but this is in my heart and I needed to share it. If you are running from Christ, take my advice. Stop. Face Him. Allow Him into your heart. Make him your Savior. Through Christ our chains are broken and made truly free.
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
A Failed Experiment Gives Occasion to Restore Freedom -- by Timothy Baldwin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no question that the United States Constitution was considered to be an EXPERIMENT. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists alike admitted it was an experiment, and it has been described as such ever since. Evidently, Americans use the term not knowing what it actually means or implies. So, what was it that made this form of government experimental? Before answering the question, let us initially identify what was NOT unique about the U.S. Constitution–aspects that many probably consider to exhibit the unique and singular greatness of the U.S. Constitution, but in reality, are not unique at all and were in fact borrowed.
First, the separation of powers in the federal government was not new. That element of government had been around literally since Moses governed Israel in Canaan. Great Britain exercised a separation of powers as well: executive power in the Monarch, legislative power in Parliament and judicial power in the courts. Second, that the form was a democratic-republic was not new. The European states and countries had exercised self-government to a greater degree than just about any other people in the history of the world. Thirdly, the experiment was not in having a bill of rights. Such an acknowledgement of people’s rights had existed in the European countries since the Magna Charta in 1215. Neither did the experiment lie in such components as term limits, voting, limited government authority, a two-house congress and the like. All of these had been well established throughout the governments of the world. All of those aspects were a given, but were only debated in terms of preference and compromise. The U.S. Constitution was in fact not new on virtually every component of its composure. So, what made it an EXPERIMENT, such that the freedom it (along with the State constitutions already in place) was supposed to protect was very susceptible to abuse and destruction? What was it about the U.S. Constitution that would transform its character from one governing the consent of the governed to one governing by the force of the Supreme Sword of the federal government? What was it about the nature of the constitution that carried with it serious risk in its implementation? And indeed it was risky, for why would the form of government be considered an experiment if the risks (now and the future) would not seriously jeopardize freedom? If the potential abuses were not serious in nature and scope, then there would be no need in describing the form of government as an experiment. In short, the EXPERIMENT was the attempt to form distinct parallel lines of powers to the State governments and Federal government with respect to their separate delegations; to allow “two sovereigns” to “occupy” the same territory over the same people; and to entrust each representative in those governments to stay within its own sphere of delegation; to allow for a standing military in the hands of the federal government and a militia army of the people in the hands of the States. This was the experiment in the world of political and social science: having two “sovereigns” with completely different purposes over the same people throughout different states with different interests. For many during that day, it was literally considered impossible; thus, the experimental nature of attempting to. I submit, that while a good run was made of the experiment, the results of the test are in, and the experiment proves to have failed. I understand that it is hard for Americans to reach this conclusion for a variety of reasons, and this is not surprising, for as our founders said, “all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.” After a while, this disposition to suffer reaches the level of voluntary and consensual slavery. To avoid that treachery, freedom-loving Americans need to get over themselves and their substance-less pride and do what is right for freedom’s sake. Do I love America? Absolutely. I love its history, legacy and heritage. I study it every day. But I love freedom more–freedom that I want to experience myself, not just read about in history books. I can assure you, however, I have no permanent affection towards forms of government. They are merely tools to reach an end, namely freedom. Government is our servant and we its master. When government becomes destructive to freedom, I have no qualms about abolishing the existing government and forming new government to secure what God has granted to me, my wife, my child, my family, my community and my body-politic. Do I believe that the U.S. Constitution equates to freedom? Absolutely not; no more than I believe that a law acknowledging my right to defend myself grants me the right to blow a would-be rapist to smithereens if he were to attempt to hurt my wife and child. I believe what human history proves, that a constitution is only one of the measures in society to protect freedom; that a “constitution may happen to be free, and the [citizen] not” (Charles de Baron Montesquieu and Julian Hawthorne, ed., The Spirit of Laws: The World’s Great Classics, vol. 1 (London: The London Press) 183); and that a constitution can become practically useless in restraining government. I believe that constitutions should be formed and re-formed by a body-politic as they deem it necessary to protect themselves. I do not understand the mentality of those shallow-thinking citizens who have the bumper sticker approach to government, “Support America. Be American!” as if to say, resistance to government or abolishing government contradicts our patriotic duty and is un-American. To the contrary, doing your patriotic duty means being ever vigilant and honest in your evaluation of political and societal conditions. It means being liberal-minded (not in the political-party sense) in our approach to government, and if necessary, instituting new forms. Is it so surprising that the societal and political changes over 250 years would completely change the character and nature of a union and the application of the “Supreme Law of the Land”? The union and the U.S. Constitution were actually bound for deconstruction, just as all governments are and all political unions that attempt to be perpetual. That the Tower-of-Babel-mentality can be successful mocks common sense and historical proof. Human nature does not allow it. The form of government of the U.S. Constitution was an experiment, admittedly not destined to live forever, for as soon as society’s character and nature change, so does the constitution governing those people. Do you think that the philosophy, beliefs, cultures and morals of a people can substantially change but the “Supreme Law of the Land” remain the same as to those completely different people in completely different times and circumstances? Get real. Justice Joseph Story, one of the most nationalistic-minded of the founding generation, admits the same thing. Concerning the inevitable fall of the political experiment, the U.S. Constitution, he says, “[T]he fabric [of the constitution] may fall; for the work of man is perishable. Nay, it must fall, if there be not the vital spirit in the people, which can alone nourish, sustain, and direct, all its movements.” (Joseph Story, A Familiar Exposition of the United States Constitution, (New York, NY, Harper and Brother, 1868 reprinted), 100-101.) This “vital spirit” of freedom has so long been absent in this country and in such a shortage of knowledge, virtue and energy that to suggest freedom can be restored in America through the current union and form of government calls into question the judgment of those who honestly hold that opinion. Does this mean that freedom cannot be restored in America? Absolutely not. Freedom can be restored and it will, but only in those places where the people believe in and practice independence, honesty and self-government enough to part with the federal government that has filled the gap of the people’s irresponsibility and lust for comfort and money with tyranny and oppression. Does the U.S. Constitution contain good principles? It sure does. It contains principles that had been accepted through political enlightened thought for centuries, just as the British Constitution did. Yet, despite containing good principles, the founding generation believed that constitutions notwithstanding, there comes a time when to remain in a political association shirks our duty to God and man. Do I believe the U.S. Constitution is perfect? Absolutely not. Neither did the founders as they said they were only forming a “more perfect union,” in anticipation that their posterity (and even current generation) would retain the priority of their virtue, morals and good faith. This description of the U.S. Constitution necessarily means that there could be a better constitution; a better form of government; and an even more perfect union. But such a “better” government will not be obtained by keeping a union so large with a constitution that “grants” to the federal government plenary power to govern hundreds of millions of people for the supposed “general welfare” of “all” and to pass any and all laws “necessary and proper” in the “pursuance” of (e.g. “living constitution”) such ends; and where the people in the States have lost virtually all control over internal polity and interest in the name of the “Supreme Law of the Land” imposed upon us since Chief Justice John Marshall rendered his opinions in the early 1800s. I propose this truth: a constitution is to be judged by its practical merits and revealing experience and not upon some indeterminable “intent” of what the “founding fathers meant.” Moreover, I ask, which founding fathers? The ones that preferred a monarchical form of government and believed the U.S. Constitution to be a consolidating effect upon the people as one body-politic? The ones that believed that Great Britain’s form of government was the best in the world and should be replicated here and who thought the U.S. Constitution was a stepping-stone to that end? The ones that imposed nationalistic practices in the federal government even during the first term of the United States’ first president? Hoping for a return to “what the founders intended” is chasing a moving shadow and ignores the reality of what this union has become “in pursuance of” the U.S. Constitution, all the intentions in the world notwithstanding. You may argue that those nationalistic-supremacy ideas were not the ones accepted by the founding fathers (which ones?), yet history proves that the federal government has reached its current status largely with the consent of all three federal branches throughout the past two centuries, in the authority of the U.S. Constitution, even from the very beginning. Has the constitution stopped this power crave and expansion? Do you think that the U.S. Supreme Court Judges have not put good reasoning to their opinions when they analyze the constitutional powers granted to the federal government? Are they all just a bunch of idiots or conspiratorial maniacs, or has the constitution not adequately maintained the lines of parallel power between people and federal government and between State government and federal government, that being the very core of this constitutional experiment? The federal government even fought a Civil War against fellow Americans to retain this “constitutional” Nationalistic Supremacy over the people of the States to govern themselves, all under the authority of the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Constitution’s effect to this national-supremacy-end has only intensified since then and gotten progressively worse. If it took over two hundred years to get to this point, which you may perceive as constitutional degradation, how long do you think it would take to get back to 1787-intent using the same constitution that has empowered the federal government during those 200-plus years? Let us shed these illusions based merely in the wishing and not in the reality. America’s founding generation told their posterity that this form of government was an EXPERIMENT. Like them, we should recognize the reality that one day new forms of government would need to be instituted for freedom’s sake, just as they showed us in the Declaration of Independence, which cited not the English Constitution as a basis of their right to live freely, but the Natural Laws of God. These laws are based upon the principles self-preservation, -defense, -improvement and -government. We, their posterity, must make similar decisions, using their good example, to secure freedom for ourselves and our posterity. May we endeavor to experiment in freedom once again.
You can build a mosque at Ground Zero when we can build a church in Mecca
Listen the point is that Ground Zero is holy ground. Thousands of our countrymen died there and if followers of Islam want to build a mosque there in the name of building briges and making amends then I'm all for it...as long as Christians can build churches in Mecca and other Islamic cities. Fair is fair. Read more about the good imam here.
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Thank God for Michael Savage
- Marriage between one man and one woman
- Borders, Language, Culture are the building blocks of any nation
- Holds that the Second Amendment is an individual right
- Supports the English Only Movement
- Holds both political parties are corrupt (hello Scott Brown)
- States the fact that Islam is the enemy of the United States
- Stands up to CAIR and other Islamic groups that mean harm to traditional American values
- Go to his website and read about him yourself. The link is listed on my link section.
- Listen to the man on the radio and YouTube
- Buy his book Banned in Britain
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Where is the conservative media?
Saturday, July 10, 2010
Pride and shame in America
The second great American I want to talk to you about is Pastor Ron Baity. He is the pastor of Berean Baptist Church in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Pastor Baity is a hero of the faith and deserves the support in ways of tithes and offerings because when he ended his prayer in the House of Represenatives in North Carolina he did a terrible and controversial thing: he ended his prayer in Jesus' name. North Carolina is one of those Bible belt states, you know the states with a church on every corner and as red (as in Republican) as you can get. And a pastor gets the shaft because he dared to pray in Jesus' name. Where is the outrage? Where are those proud Republican Christians? The silence tells the story. Most churches in America today are as dead as a tomb. The Moral Majority has no strength left, its political might has been all but spent. Jesus was crucified before by the Romans at the behest of Jewish religious leaders who feared Him. Now he is being crucified by apostate and cowardly Christians at the alter of political correctness and self deception. Thank God that Pastor Baity is made of sterner stuff. America we need more men like Pastor Baity and Mr. Bozarth. To the people of North Carolina in particular, if you belong to one of those social club churches who compromises the Gospel of Christ I urge you to support Pastor Baity with your tithes and let your own pastors know if they don't grow a spine you will no longer support him. If we as Americans don't support true American patriots like these two men then we have no right to complain about what we get. All evil needs to get stronger is for good people to stay silent. Now you have a choice to make. What will you do? Read about these sad events in North Carolina here. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/07/09/pastor-yanked-capitol-jesus-prayer/?test=latestnews. See an interview here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47bRY7yJ0QA
Thursday, July 8, 2010
No civil rights protection for whites
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzBVxP5wzCY
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qX4dcvIYk9A&feature=related
- When Mister Shabazz the chairman of the NBPP party was interviewed as to why armed members of his group were there he said this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BemSmTNDxU&feature=related. Isn't it interesting how there is no cellphone video or reports from poll watchers about this happening?
You can see the man with the nightstick in the first video STANDING IN FRONT OF THE DOOR for God's sake and the people watching the polls didn't seem to mind that. Now, watch what happens when the reporter goes up there: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thqk8kDK6Z0&feature=related. I guess they don't mind Black Panthers with nightsticks standing at the door but reporters are truly dangerous and need to move. What an outrage.
Now, I know some of y'all are probably thinking why am I even writing about this. Let me tell you. The vote is the cornerstone of our republic. It is our voice. Most countries in the world (North Korea, China, Cube for example) do not allow the vote. Dictators don't allow the vote. Look at what happened in Iran last year with its elections. Reports from anywhere between eighty and over two hundred protesters were killed because a election was rigged and they had the gall to stand up against it. Let me be clear. I do not care who you are, if you are an intimidating factor at a voting place you have crossed the line and it is a civil rights violation. So the Department of Justice will take care of this problem right? We will get to that in a bit. First lets learn some about the New Black Panther Party. Here is the link to the groups website. Read the statement and then you will get an idea of what this group is all about. http://www.newblackpanther.com/intro.html
The argument on the website is that the man with the nightstick was suspended for his roll for a time (he is once again a member of the party) and that as an organisation the NBPP holds zero liability. That is a bunch of hogwash. I am a member of the NRA. If I was wearing NRA garb and tried the garbage that this guy did the NRA would be in just as much trouble as ( rightfully so I might add ) be in. And after getting kicked out of the NRA I highly doubt they'd let me back in. The Panther was not kicked out, he was suspended and according to the statement on the website is once again a full member. Nice huh? Here is some background on the group: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party
Now to the Department of Justice. Incredibly, the DoJ has decided NOT to bring charges against the NBPP for civil rights violations (i.e. voter intimidation) siting no evidence despite videos from cell phones and Fox News showing a man with a nightstick in front of the doors of the voting area. Take a look at this interview. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BemSmTNDxU&feature=related. To this writer, it seems that if you are white you can not be the victim of a civil rights violation brought about by a minority. If this is indeed true then there is corruption in one of our most powerful departments and it must be stamped out.
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Tolerance must work both ways
- Muslims are always crying out about hate when they run into any opposition to the plans they are hatching. Of all the character assassins CAIR is the worse. They sued Michael Savage simply because they did not like what he was saying. Inclosed are some links for you to look at.
- http://www.savage-productions.com/Savage_CAIR_suit.html
- http://www.cair.com/
- http://www.cair.com/ArticleDetails.aspx?ArticleID=26462&&name=n&&currPage=1&&Active=1
That last link should make your blood boil. There are plans to build a mosque in sight of the World Trade Center and the dedication for that mosque would be on September the 11th! Naturally there is outrage (and rightly so!) to this plan, and naturally the people who are against this scheme are being labeled with the racist/bigot brush. Let me point out some things about how tolerant our Muslim friends are.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Rahman_(convert)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy_in_Islam
- http://www.compassdirect.org/english/country/iran/16025/
And don't you dare draw a picture of the "prophet" Mohammad. If you want to see some people practicing peaceful Islam and showing that tolerance that they want then take a look. Michael Savage (the first link) has the right idea.
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLHxkJdq2Zg&feature=related
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeSHUMm8IRs&feature=related
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yf1YBoMC-oE
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxPG2Kf21KE&feature=related
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVXJaqcoC7k&feature=related
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsypz-8esFw&feature=related
Look at this video. Our government looks to Fatah to lead the Palestinians and be a peace partner. Now watch this and tell me just how in the world you expect that to happen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXyh8WeRYiE&feature=related
This woman explains why genocide is perfectly alright with her.
You can't open a church in Islamic countries. You can't witness for Christ in Islamic countries. I am so sick and tired of America being portrayed as the world villain. I am sick and tired of having to be tolerant while the people demanding that tolerance have none for themselves. The people of the United States need to wake up. We are surrounded by people who seek to destroy our way of life. If we as a people don't awaken to the dangers of corrupt politicians and other enemies who seek our end, the only ones we will be able to blame for our doom is ourselves.
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Once again only one vote dictates freedom or tyrany
- The Second Amendment is an individual right and a civil right (like the right to vote for example)
- We, as Americans, have a right to self defense
- Ruled that the US Constitution supersedes state and local law
I'd just like to touch on these three points. First, all the rights in our Bill of Rights are individual rights. When the Constitution says people that is exactly what it means. The people. You and me. For example how could anyone say that the word people in the First Amendment be different than the word people in the Second? People are people right? Sadly, there are congressmen, senators, and even Supreme Court judges who make the argument that the people in the First Amendment are not the same people in the Second or even the Tenth Amendments. Just how they reach that conclusion boggles the mind, but they do. Just one vote certified that the people are indeed the people. That is scary. What would have happened if Justice Kennedy had ruled the other way? I shudder in dread and fear at the thought. Oh, and just one more thing. Justice Sotomayor who was nominated to the Court by President Obama stated she believed the Second Amendment was an individual right but voted for the gun ban in Chicago. So much for those individual rights huh? Here are some links about the case.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._Chicago
- http://www.suntimes.com/news/nation/2440144,gun-rights-supreme-court-ruling-062810.article
- http://www1.voanews.com/english/news/usa/US-Supreme-Court-Strikes-Down-Chicago-Gun-Ban--97377444.html
Mayor Daley says he will rewrite the ordnance and this writer believes that most likely what he will do is charge insane prices for training and a license so that the majority of lower to middle class Americans in the city simply would not be able to afford to buy a gun. That is just my opinion but I'll be a bearded gnome if he doesn't try a scheme like that.
Secondly, to affirm that we, as Americans, have the right to self defense all one needs to do is read what the Founders wrote on the subject. See some quotes here. http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
The most troubling aspect of this for me is that the Court ruled that what it says supersedes State and local laws. That logic is flawed. The truth is that every State is independent and is a part of a federal republic. That is why the States have constitutions themselves. The United States Constitution is binding on the federal government only. Why you might ask does this matter? Freedom won yesterday, didn't it? No, not really. What happened yesterday is that one vote prevented the death of the Second Amendment and allowed the federal government to cede itself more power. And that is bad news for everyone.
Friday, June 25, 2010
Once again the Korean War is forgotten but Michael Jackson is remembered.
- A three year long war begins
- That war claims 36,516 American lives
- 92,134 American servicemen are wounded in this conflict
- 8,176 Americans are MIA
- 7,245 Americans are taken as POWs
The Korean War lasted from 1950 to 1953 and I don't give a damn that the United Nations called the war a "police action." It was a shooting war that claimed the lives of the sons and daughters of the United States. It was the first time that the sons and daughters of this country were asked to give their lives in a war without a congressional declaration of war. It was the first time that Americans were asked to give their lives for a UN mandate and the bureaucrats at the UN don't even have the decency to call it a war. A police action? Give me a break. The war began when communist North Korea launched a war of aggression against the Republic of Korea (South Korea) and our brave fighting men fought and bled and died defending a poor country that simply did not have the ability to defend itself and we here in America, for the most part, don't even remember this even happened. It infuriates me. It shames me. And by God, it should shame you too. We owe our fathers and grandfathers the honor that has been denied them for far to long.
To add insult to injury is when people in the public light say straight faced that World War II was the last war America (I guess that forgot about Granada, Panama, and the First Gulf War) won or dare to say that we lost the Korean War. How dare they. LOOK AT A MAP! IS SOUTH KOREA STILL THERE? YES IT IS! WE DID NOT LOOSE. South Korea is very much independent and went from being one of the poorest nations on Earth to one of the richest. Everyone in the public sphere who has ever uttered that slander owes a much higher debt than those of us who have forgotten this war even happened. That statement is an out and out lie, a slander, and it is repugnant. Thankfully the people of South Korea haven't forgotten the sacrifice that our dads and granddads made. In Vietnam, South Koreans bled and died alongside American soldiers. Even today in Afghanistan and Iraq the warriors of South Korea are there helping shoulder the burden and this writer for one thanks them.
The final insult on this hallowed day is the fact that while people have forgotten and/or ignored the fact that a war that claimed so many American lives (and took 138,000 South Korean lives) we remember that Michael Jackson, that great American artist died a year ago today. Last time I checked the major networks are planning a three day tribute to...no, not America's finest who were asked to give everything for a foreign country, but to...Michael Jackson. How the mighty have fallen. How the hell are we going to take our country back? People talk big about liberty and freedom and fighting the new world order and all this other big talk but let me tell you something. Until we take back our homes and teach our posterity just what a true hero is (and Michael Jackson IS NOT a hero) we are just kidding ourselves. The next time you see a Korean War vet, and there aren't many left, walk up to him, look him in the eye. Shake his hand and say, "Thank you sir. Others may have forgotten what you and yours did, but for me and my house, we remember."
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Could there be amnesty without Congress having a say?
In all seriousness if Obama was able to do this, it would be a disaster and a Constitutional crisis of epic proportions. Thankfully, even some of the drones in Washington may be taking notice. Nobody likes to lose power after all, and maybe that will be our best ally against this power play. The greed of politicians against the greed of politicians. Anyway I'm rambling again (see what only three hours of sleep does to a guy?) Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa and eight other senators got wind of this power grab and have written a letter to the president.
Here is a link to the letter sent to President Obama.
http://hatch.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=DataPipes.ViewPDF&Id=5c7c629c-1b78-be3e-e0c6-81b26b437781
If you care about illegal immigration and the rule of law like I do then we must all take action now to stop this. Call your senator and spread the word on this story. It is grossly under reported. It kind of makes one wonder why that is, doesn't it? One has to wonder if California would still be able to cut millions of dollars in welfare payments to illegals if they were granted amnesty. What? You didn't know about that? OHere is the link take a gander for yourself.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2009/jul/illegal-aliens-get-monthly-welfare-checks-0
Anyway I'm sure that La Raza and The Home Depot, not to mention the Democratic Party would be thrilled to take advantage of this executive order if it is allowed to happen.
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Why do we have a 10th Amendment to our Constitution?
Now that I'm a bit older and have read more books I learned a few things. One, history isn't taught in our school system. Civics class is a joke. And lastly, I was dumb as a rock when it came to how government worked. I always have believed in states rights and I knew that before the War Between the States (also incorrectly called the Civil War) that the Southern States seceded from the Union in the belief that they already independent States and had the power to do so. I'm not going to get into the cause of the war in this article, but I will tell you now that if you were taught it was over slavery then you are wrong. That is a bald faced lie and you need to go to a library and get educated. The Southern States fought a war that ultimately took one million American lives because they believed that the Federal government has zero right to tell a state what to do in an internal matter. Read that again. Now, scroll up and read the 10th Amendment and lastly I'd like you to read the Constitution. After you do that come back to this article for some more truth that will either make you think either:
- I'm a right wing evil slime ball who wants to raise an army and overthrow the government
- A very confused Redneck (my wife is black for those who think I'm a racist. If that doesn't make your head blow up I'm not sure what will)
- Maybe this guy Robby has stumbled unto something
Here is some truth. First, our Founding Fathers were secessionists. Gasp. I said it. What did they advocate and fight a war for? Yes, a war for the Independence of 13 colonies. That meant that they had to secede from the British Empire for that to happen. Did you learn that tidbit in school? Neither did I. There was not a plan at all for a single united nation with a strong federal government. The Articles of Confederation was the first attempt by the Founders to join the States (the capital 'S' is intentional) info a political union was a flop. That is why they had a convention and now have the US Constitution that formed the Federal government. Now, if you read the Constitution like I asked you to, you'll notice somethings that just don't mesh with our current system of government.
- The Federal government has ZERO authority over State issues
- The Federal government has ZERO authority to do -anything- in regards to education
- The Supreme Court has ZERO authority over State constitutions or internal State affairs
- There isn't -anything- about a Federal Reserve Bank. *gasp* Why not? BECAUSE THE FED IS NOT A PART OF THE GOVERNMENT! They are as much a part of the US government as FedEX is.
Now, I simply do not have the education to be as articulate as I feel this article requires, so I am going to ask my readers to do some more homework now that you've read the Constitution....yeah I know, great, more homework. Well, here it goes. It is very easy. Watch these two YouTube videos first.
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89nB8altumI&feature=related
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Yohjhj5e1Y&feature=related
The speaker is Timothy Baldwin, the head of the Liberty Defense League. He is one of the most brilliant people I've ever had the chance to speak too, and I am reading his book Freedom for a Change. It is available on Amazon.com and I'll include the links so you can look at the book and I do hope, buy the book. This is a free commercial by the way, I have not been paid to promote this book and even if the offer was made I'd refuse it. It is just a damned good book. Buy it. Read it. Get educated.
- http://libertydefenseleague.com/freedom-for-a-change/
- http://www.amazon.com/Freedom-Change-Timothy-Baldwin/dp/0984339507/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1277279265&sr=8-1-spell
Monday, June 21, 2010
The Home Depot is not a friend of the United States or Christians
The world's largest home improvement company, Home Depot, has some explaining to do. In the name of diversity, the big shots at Home Depot have partnered with a racist group called La Raza. For some background on La Raza look at these following links:
- http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Council_of_La_Raza
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY7Qp3qaL2o
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGqPo5ofk0s&feature=related
It is this writers opinion that it would be more forgivable for The Home Depot to support the New Black Panther Party than these thugs. How is support for this group any different than supporting the KKK? If there is a difference then please explain it to me. The Home Depot is in bed with an organization that actively supports socialism at best and communism at the worse. They give dollars that you may spend for that new grill, or light bulb, or pipe, to a group that wants to dismantle our country. Here are the links on Home Depot's own website bragging about supporting these thugs, these vermin.
As repugnant as what I have just told you, it doesn't end there. It has come to light that The Home Depot contributed at least $5,000 to the Nashville Gay Pride Parade and set up craft booths for children at these parades. Sadly, Nashville isn't the only city that The Home Depot has done this in. Atlanta, Portland, and Kansas City, among others, have had The Home Depot financially support these displays of perversion all in the name of diversity. Take a look at the corporate website again and once again you see a public embrace of this sinful lifestyle by The Home Depot.
Now before anyone goes off half cocked and starts the whole bigot attack let me be clear about something. I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU DO IN YOUR OWN HOME! However, when this type of perversion is going on in public and children are exposed to this perverse lifestyle it is sickening and in this writers opinion it is tantamount to child abuse.
I'll close with this thought. If you are a patriot who loves your country, if you are a Bible believing Christian, send The Home Depot a message they can not afford to ignore in this economy. Contact your local store and email the corporate offices. Tell them if they insist on supporting La Raza or these Gay Pride Days then they will not have your dollars. Money talks louder than emails and phone calls after all.
The Home Depot can be contacted at 1-800-466-3337.
Guns would NEVER be taken by the government if Republicans controled it...no...honest...
- The Patriot Act
- Two undeclared wars. The Constitution requires Congress make a Declaration of War. Just having a vote that says go ahead doesn't pass the smell test.
- An unprecedented expansion of government due to TSA and the Department of Homeland Security. Don't you feel safer?
- Bush pressed for amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants
- Bush started the bailout ball rolling down the slippery socialist slope we now find ourselves on.
- And now this little bombshell. Guns were taken by state and federal police and national guard troops at the behest of Ray Nagin and the Chief of Police Warren Riley. The silence from the White House would deafen anyone. Here are some links so you can see and read for yourself what happened. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4,
- http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/08/national/nationalspecial/08cnd-storm.html,
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm5PC7z79-8&feature=related
This was pure martial law. Where was President Bush at when all this was happening? The Second Amendment was written for situations like what happened after Katrina. In short, the Right to Keep and Bear Arms doesn't have a thing to do with rabbit hunting. Now tell me, if a "gun friendly" president was in office then with a "gun friendly" Congress what would happen now if another disaster struck? Would Obama come out in defense of your rights? If you believe he would I have a bridge I'll sell you in Utah.